Thursday, December 29, 2011

Army finds fault with US probe head




ISLAMABAD - Rejecting the detailed NATO probe on last month’s border attack, Pakistan Army has questioned the validity of the findings supervised by a military man who held command of allied forces in Afghanistan.
The military has expressed serious reservations over the US Air Force Brigadier General Stephen Clark’s leading the Mohmand attack probe while refusing to show any compliance for the launch of a fresh investigation.
The development reportedly followed an exchange of written communication between the Pentagon and Pakistan’s military headquarters (GHQ) amid the reports that the latter has raised serious questions over the authenticity of the NATO report under the supervision of Brigadier General Clark.
According to informed officials, the Pakistan military holds Clark as one of the commanders responsible for the November 26 deadly attack on two Pakistani military pickets - Volcano and Boulder - that killed 24 soldiers. As head of Air Force Special Operations Forces (AFSOF), Clark remained Colonel Commandant of the 27 Special Operations Forces (SOF) Wing that carries out ground and aerial operations in Afghanistan. The 16 Squadron Wing of the United States Air Force (USAF), that saw its gunship choppers bombarding the Pakistani pickets, was also headed by Brigadier General Clark in his official capacity as the chief pilot.
The Squadron 16, it is learnt, directly oversees the operational command of the sophisticated gunship choppers AC-130 H Spectre that were used in the Mohmand Agency attack. Apart from heading the combat mission in Afghanistan, Brigadier General Clark also remained the Commander of 4th SOF at the USAF.
Citing the afore-stated factors, Pakistan’s military, in the Wednesday’s correspondence with the Pentagon, is reported to have pointed out Stephen Clark’s unsuitability for leading a sensitive probe that, according to military circles, compromised his objective position owing to his direct professional linkages with allied combat forces in Afghanistan. “He is not neutral. Given that he himself commands the Special Operations Forces, we have grounds to believe that the November 26 episode did not happen without Clark’s consent. He is as much to be held responsible as General Allen is,” military officials said.
When contacted on Wednesday, the NATO Air Operations spokesperson in Afghanistan Christopher DeWitt told this scribe that Pentagon was in better position to address any queries on Brigadier General Stephen Clark. Pentagon’s spokesperson George Little was not accessible at his official cell phone nor did he return the emails. 
The NATO, it is further learnt, has offered Pakistan to launch a fresh probe into Mohmand Agency with Pakistan military being part of the investigation but this suggestion has also been turned down. “They’re not ready to accept anything but wanting the NATO to claim full responsibility of the border bombing incident and apologise unconditionally,” Nato-based sources said about Pakistan’s disinterest shown regarding the probe.
Earlier last Friday, Pakistan Army had rejected the initial findings of the investigation on Mohmand Agency attack released by the Pentagon. A military statement had said, detailed response (to the report) would be given as and when the formal report was received. This newspaper had reported Sunday that NATO was unlikely to share the detailed report with Pakistani military sensing adverse reaction from the latter. This development followed the requests by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) Chief General David Mattis which had been turned down for a meeting with Pakistan Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani. Reportedly, General Mattis wanted to visit Pakistan to brief the country’s military top brass on November 26 attack.
Pakistani officials say that the military refused to cooperate on last month’s probe because the probe’s findings in the presence of General John Allen, the NATO Commander in Afghanistan, and Brigadier General Clark were “pretty obvious”. Military circles believe that an impartial inquiry was not possible without putting into probe General Allen, Clark and Afghan National Army’s Head General Sher Muhammad Karimi.
Special Correspondent from Washington adds: While dropping hints of disciplinary action against those responsible for last month’s NATO attack that killed 26 Pakistani soldiers, the US military said Tuesday that Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has been briefed on its investigation into the deadly incident.
The full report was presented to Gen Kayani by a US military officer stationed at the US Embassy in Islamabad, Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain John Kirby told reporters.
He said the report from the joint US-Nato investigative team was not released publicly until Monday to allow time for the Pakistani leadership to read the findings first. “We wanted General Kayani to be able to see the entire thing,” he said. The approach represented ‘an appropriate professional courtesy’ to Kayani, he added.
A summary of the report was released Thursday by the officer who led the investigation, Brigadier General Stephen Clark.
The US report provides more details on the November 25-26 air strikes that Clark says were the result of a series of mistakes and botched communications on both sides — reflecting an underlying mistrust between the two countries.
It took the NATO-led force 90 minutes to halt air strikes after a Pakistani liaison officer first alerted US and coalition counterparts that Pakistani troops were coming under fire from American aircraft, the report said.
The probe also said the US military had failed to notify the Pakistanis in advance of the night raid near the border and that a coalition officer mistakenly gave the wrong location of the US troops to his Pakistani counterpart.
Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, said military leaders will use the final report on the investigation to determine if anyone should be punished. Those decisions, he said, would be made by officers in the chain of command, depending on whether they found that mistakes were made by US or NATO personnel.

Allah Ho Akbar - Pakistan Army Song

Hum Matwale - Pakistan Army Song

Dosti By Jawad Ahmed - Pakistan Army Song

Qasm Us Waqt Ki - Pakistan Army Song

Pak Fauj Tu Zinda Bad - Pakistan Army Song

Hum Pakistan Ki Burri Fauj - Pakistan Army Song

Hum Barhtay Jain Gay - Pakistan Army Song

Main Ne Janma Hai - Pakistan Army Song

Shar dalair Sipahi - Pakistan Army Song

Sindhi Hum, Balochi Hum , Pakistan National Song

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

US asks for Pakistan army secret info


Washington: US military officials urged Pakistan to regularly disclose classified information regarding Pakistani military facilities and installations along the border with Afghanistan, US media reported on Tuesday.
Commander of the US Central Command General James Mattis made the plea late Monday following a November 26 incident in which NATO helicopters and fighter jets attacked two military border posts in northwest Pakistan and killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, US based "Press-TV" reported on Tuesday.
"The strongest take-away from this incident is the fundamental fact that we must improve border coordination," Mattis claimed in a statement.
He also called for establishing a shared database between the two countries, saying that an increase in information could help NATO forces in Pakistan avert similar incidents.
In addition, Mattis ordered the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) to seek ways to improve its relations with Islamabad.
US Air Force Brigadier General Stephen Clark, who led an investigation into last month’s incident, said on Thursday that US forces bore some responsibility for the deaths as they relied on the wrong maps, were unaware of Pakistani border post locations and mistakenly provided the wrong location for the troops.
The investigation, however, claimed that the US forces "acted in self-defense and with appropriate force after being fired upon," and that there was "no intentional effort to target persons or places known to be part of the Pakistani military or to deliberately provide inaccurate location information to Pakistani officials."
The Pakistani military has dismissed the investigation and said it does not "agree with the findings of the US/NATO inquiry as [it is] being reported in media."
Pakistani officials accuse US-led forces of deliberately carrying out the air strikes from inside Afghanistan.
Following the November incident, US President Barack Obama offered condolences for those killed in the attack but failed to issue an official apology.
Pakistan decided to halt the supply convoys destined for US-led foreign soldiers in Afghanistan in retaliation for the deadly airstrikes and blockade has entered in second month which causing difficulties to foreign troops deployed in landlocked Afghanistan.
US-led planes and helicopters have increasingly violated the Pakistani airspace over the past months.
The US claims its drone raids target militants who cross the Pakistani border into Afghanistan. But locals say civilians are the main victims of the unauthorized attacks.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Pakistani army rejects US report on airstrikes


The Pakistani army has rejected key findings from a US investigation into American airstrikes last month that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and has said the report was unlikely to repair the severely damaged relationship between the two countries.
The investigation details of which were released Thursday concluded that mistakes on both sides led to last month's deadly attack along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan has maintained its troops did nothing wrong and the attack was a deliberate act of aggression.
Pakistan refused to participate in the investigation, claiming past US probes into border incidents were biased. It also retaliated against the attack by closing its border to NATO supplies meant for troops in Afghanistan and kicking the US out of a base used to operate American drones.
Pakistan's response, while not surprising, is likely to worry Washington since the country's support is critical for the Afghan war. Pakistan not only provides a key route for supplies, but is important for peace negotiations with the Taliban.

Pakistani army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas rejected the report's claim that Pakistani troops fired at American and Afghan forces first, triggering the incident. He told The Associated Press in an interview on Friday that Pakistani forces retaliated only after coalition helicopters "started engagement." He also denied that Pakistan failed to notify NATO of the location of the two border posts that were attacked.
Abbas expressed surprise and frustration that the US refused to apologize for the deaths of the soldiers, something many Pakistanis have demanded. He rejected an American offer to pay compensation to the victims' families, saying the army has its own welfare system.
"Nobody is interested in compensation," he said. "It is not in our military culture to take money for a fallen soldier. It is abhorred. We will take care of our own," Abbas said.
US officials on Thursday accepted some blame for the incident and expressed regret for the deaths, but said their troops acted "with appropriate force" in self-defence because they thought they were being attacked by Taliban insurgents.
Brig. Gen. Stephen Clark, an Air Force special operations officer who led the investigation, said in a Pentagon briefing that US forces did not know that the two relatively new Pakistani outposts spare structures constructed with stacked gray stones had been set up on the border.
Abbas repeated the army's claim that Pakistan had given NATO maps that clearly marked the location of the two outposts Volcano and Boulder located on a mountain ridge in the Mohmand tribal area. He also said the Taliban do not use such structures.
"Taliban do not make posts," said Abbas. "No insurgents make posts. It is a running war against insurgents."
Abbas accused NATO and Afghan forces of "gross violations" of standard operating procedures, including not informing Pakistan that their forces would be conducting an overnight operation along the border on Nov. 25-26 when the attack occurred.
Clark acknowledged the US had not informed Pakistan that American and Afghan commandos were conducting an operation. US and NATO commanders believe that some of their military operations have been compromised when they've given details and locations to the Pakistanis, he said.
US Marine Gen. John Allen, the coalition's top commander in Afghanistan, was in Pakistan meeting army chief Gen. Pervez Ashfaq Kayani at the time of the incident in an attempt to repair their relationship. Kayani had made the overture to Allen, inviting him to Pakistan.
Pentagon officials said Thursday that military leaders had spoken by phone with Kayani about the report's conclusions, but have not yet given him a detailed briefing.
Abbas accused US and NATO forces of ignoring established rules of engagement aimed at avoiding friendly fire incidents. These rules demand troops under attack contact Pakistan to determine whether fire is coming from one of the country's outposts.
Abbas said Pakistan informed NATO forces in Afghanistan that the Volcano post has been hit, "but they kept firing and hit Boulder as well as the reinforcements going to help out the soldiers at Volcano."
Clark acknowledged US forces failed to determine who was firing at them and whether there were friendly Pakistani forces in the area. Clark said US forces used incorrect maps and mistakenly provided Pakistan with the wrong location where they said fighting was taking place an area almost 14 kilometres away.
Abbas gave no indication of when Pakistan might lift its embargo on NATO supplies to troops in Afghanistan. However, he indicated the government would levy additional fees when the route is eventually reopened.
"You can't use our port, destroy our roads and get away without paying for it," Abbas said.
The attack was the latest of a series of crises to strain the relationship between Pakistan and the US this year. A CIA contractor shot and killed two Pakistanis in the eastern city of Lahore in January, setting off a storm of anti-American protests.
This anger was compounded by the US raid that killed Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani garrison town in May. The Pakistanis were outraged by the operation because they were not told about it beforehand.
Abbas said the future relationship between the Pakistani and US militaries will likely be defined in a "very stern, formal way ... with well-defined limits of cooperation."

Happy Birth Day to Quaid of Pakistan ( The Great Quaid )


Saturday, December 24, 2011

Why Obama should apologise to Pakistan

In the wee hours of November 27, US-Nato and Afghan forces based in Afghanistan’s Kunar province engaged a Pakistani military outpost in Pakistan’s tribal agency of Momand. Little information is publically available — or likely to be — about what happened or how. What is clear is that after several Nato airstrikes, 24 Pakistani soldiers were dead and many more injured. The episode, and the US response, battered the ever-strained US-Pakistan relationship. Pakistan immediately cut off ground routes for logistical support of the US-led war in Afghanistan, and insisted that the United States vacate Shamsi, one of the airfields from which the US launched drone attacks.

In quick succession, Pakistan convened a parliamentary commission to determine whether and how Pakistan will remain engaged with the United States. Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs recalled all of its ambassadors to hold a high-level strategic discussion about how Pakistan should refashion its relations with the United States. Their recommendations will be considered by the same parliamentary commission. Pakistanis, whether civilian or military, whether in the government or on the street, want out of this relationship and deeply believe that Americans do not value Pakistani lives. They may not be wrong.
Pakistani military officials quickly denounced the attack as deliberate, unprovoked US aggression and demanded both an immediate apology and a renegotiation of military and intelligence cooperation. That Pakistani officials made such pronouncements in the complete absence of information about the attack cast aspersions on their motives. The move appeared to be another effort to wriggle free fromWashington’s poisonous embrace, abandon military operations against anti-Pakistan militants, and pursue an independent Afghan policy.

While rejecting the Pakistani military’s account, Nato and US officials declined to officially speculate about the details of the event — much less offer an apology — until a full investigation was complete. The investigation is now complete. The report has been issued, and the Pentagon released a statement on Thursday saying only that “US forces, given what information they had available to them at the time, acted in self defence and with appropriate force after being fired upon.” There was, the statement said, “no intentional effort to target persons or places known to be part of the Pakistani military, or to deliberately provide inaccurate location information to Pakistani officials.” Instead, “inadequate coordination by US and Pakistani military officers... resulted in a misunderstanding about the true location of Pakistani military units.” The statement expressed regret, but neither President Barack Obama nor Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has issued a forthright apology. Unfortunately, neither is likely to do so given the toxic atmosphere in Washington and the looming presidential campaign.
The US ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, urged Obama to apologise, but he was quickly cut down. Munter has sought to mitigate Pakistanis’ anger by saying in Urdu “humay bahut afsos hai” (“We are very sorry”). On Monday, he joined several interfaith leaders in offering a prayer at Islamabad’s Faisal Mosque for the Pakistani soldiers killed on November 27, offering, “We share in this grief, and we share in this sorrow.” The author’s contacts here in Islamabad and in Washington lament that instead of heeding the sagacious advice of the ambassador, who understands the raw sentiments of Pakistanis, some within the US government dismiss Munter as “having gone native.”
 
While the Pentagon report apportions blame to both sides, an astute reader can only conclude that the most heinous mistakes were not made by Pakistan. The report claims that Nato and Afghan troops came under fire from Pakistani positions. (Official Pakistani sources refute this.) Believing they were under attack by insurgents, the Nato and Afghan troops called for suppressive air fire. The report concedes that, contrary to established standard operating procedures, Nato did not inform Pakistan that the operation on the border was taking place. This supports early US claims that Nato-Afghan forces came under fire. After all, how could the Pakistani soldiers know that the forces moving near their area of operations were “allied forces”? (Americans dismiss this and say Pakistan should have known better. After all, the insurgents do not have helicopter gunships.) While one can get caught up in the details of who fired first and why, Nato’s failure to follow established procedures is indefensible.

But this is not the most egregious mistake. The worst — and fatal error — was the fact that the Americans provided the Pakistani army with incorrect coordinates for the designated targets of AC-130 gunships and attack helicopters. In the early days of the incident, there were several claims and counterclaims about whether the coordinates were given, whether they were correct, and whether the Pakistan army had cleared the coordinates before the attack. However, the report makes evident that Pakistan’s clearance of the coordinates or lack thereof is immaterial: The strikes would still have killed those innocent soldiers because the coordinates were simply wrong.

The details of the report, and its efforts to apportion blame across all sides, will not satisfy Pakistanis, who feel they have suffered too much and received too little from this partnership over the last 10 years. They want nothing more than an apology from Obama. Despite the report’s tedious efforts to parse culpability, it is obvious that most of the onus falls on the United States and Nato. So why does the United States steadfastly refuse to do the right thing and issue a clear apology to Pakistan and its citizenry in and out of uniform?
Like Pakistanis, American officials and citizens alike are war weary and angry. As the endgame in Afghanistan approaches, Americans are now — or should be — confronting the vacuity of our Afghan policy. Vice President Joe Biden, who has taken a lot of heat for saying, “the Taliban, per se, is not our enemy,” was right: We invaded Afghanistan to destroy al Qaeda. The Taliban were not the immediate objects of our intervention. (For this reason, Biden advocated for a robust counterterrorism strategy and advised against a counterinsurgency policy that implied a war on the Taliban and affiliated fighters rather than on al Qaeda.) Once the United States decided to make the Taliban the enemy — for the simple reason that the Taliban and affiliated fighters are killing American and allied troops whom they see as occupying Afghanistan — it also made Pakistan an enemy as well.

Just as Pakistanis are deeply aggrieved that US forces killed 24 of their soldiers, Americans are increasingly outraged that thousands of troops have been killed or maimed in Afghanistan at the hands of Pakistan’s proxies.

But neither the United States nor Pakistan will benefit from a continued and escalating standoff. America needs Pakistan to conclude its Afghanistan misadventure. This requires Pakistan to productively assert its influence to achieve a negotiated settlement that is palatable to most in the country.
As for Pakistan, it’s an economic disaster case. Pakistanis have long endured incomprehensible electricity outages. Now, they lack inadequate gas to cook or heat their homes. Public transportation has been strangled by shortages in compressed natural gas. Water is in acute scarcity. Pakistan’s manufacturing sector is struggling to remain competitive under these adverse conditions. Although Pakistan has told the IMF to take a hike, most informed Pakistanis concede that it will again have to approach the IMF sooner rather than later. As Pakistan knows well, the United States is a key actor in that institution. In short, Pakistan and the United States must forge a sustainable way of working together because the strategic and regional interests of both depend on it.

The United States must swiftly act to rectify this mess first by apologising. Second, the US military must hold to account those officers who are responsible for this tragedy. Not only should the appropriate personnel be demoted or ousted per the severity of their negligence, but prosecution may also be merited.
Americans will howl in protest. They may rightly counter that no senior Pakistani military or intelligence officials lost their jobs when Osama bin Laden was found hanging out in Abbottabad, a military garrison town not far from Islamabad. But the United States claims to promote democracy, accountability, justice, law and order, and human rights. Now is the time to prove it. Pakistanis need to know that their lives matter as much as those of others.

5 Pakistani soldiers killed in a suicide attack

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Police say a suicide car bomber has attacked a paramilitary camp in northwestern Pakistan, killing at least five soldiers.

Police officer Tahir Khan says the attack Saturday in Bannu town in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province also wounded 18 soldiers.
A spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban, Ehsanullah Ehsan, claimed responsibility for the attack. He said they targeted the troops to avenge the killing of a Taliban commander in a recent U.S. drone attack.
The Taliban attacked a paramilitary camp before dawn Friday, killing one soldier and kidnapping 15 others. They said that attack was also meant to avenge the dead commander.

Kiyani visit Kurram Agencies - ISPR

Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani visited the forward posts in Mohmand and Kurram Agencies on 22 December 2011.

While speaking to the troops, he appreciated the successes achieved under trying environment and the sacrifices made in the process. He said that no one can put a price tag on the sacred blood of Shuhada of the Nation. The men and women of Pakistan Army are performing their duty of defending Pakistan in accordance with the oath they took. They will continue to do so with the support and prayers of their countrymen, regardless of the cost.


Responding to a question, COAS reiterated that Pakistan Army has and will continue to support democratic process in the Country. The Army is fully cognizant of its constitutional obligations and responsibilities.
 He strongly dispelled the speculations of any military takeover and said that these are misleading and are being used as a bogey to divert the focus from the real issues.


He emphasized that the issues of national security need to be considered on merit alone. He concluded by saying that irrespective of all other considerations, there can be no compromise on national security.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Lieutenant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood Shaheed

Lieutenant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood remains a brave but forgotten warrior of 1971.

My personal association with him goes back to 1969 while my fathers personal association with him goes back to 1949 when he was my fathers class fellow at the Gordon College Rawalpindi.

Originally commanding 22 Baloch , Lieuternant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood Shaheed , relinquished command over a matter of professional disagreement with his GOC in East Pakistan.

He was then re-assigned to command 32 Baloch .

He ran into an Indian ambush while leading 32 Baloch in a pitch dark night.Lieuternant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood Shaheed embraced martyrdom with many bullets in his chest while 32 Baluch fled the battle field abandoning their brave commanding officers body which was never recovered.

Lieuternant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood Shaheeds gallantry was acknowledged by the opposing Indian commanders and also acknowledged in Indian newspapers.

He is survived by two sons and a daughter.His younger son Brigadier Nauman Mahmood ably commanded a brigade in FATA in action and is now Chief Instructor at the Command and staff College Quetta.

His younger brother Brigadier Raja Aftab rose to brigadier rank and is an outstanding gentleman.

May Allah bless the brave soul of  Lieuternant Colonel Raja Sultan Mahmood Shaheed

Major Agha.H.Amin (Retired) ,Armoured Corps

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Panic for Nato, Nato supplies on hold by Pakistan

Islamabad–Though initially the United States was not showing any anxiety on Pakistan’s action to halt all supplies to US-led forces in Afghanistan through Pakistani soil, at least the statements emanated from Washington reflected so, but, after three weeks, the reports reaching from Afghanistan suggested that Pakistani action has inflicted a telling blow on them.

A panic-like situation is witnessed in the military camps and garrisons across the Durand line as level of mobility and actions of the forces fighting with Taliban have come down. The winter has become very harsh for the NATO forces after cutting off fuel supply through tankers from Pakistan, standing in long queues at Pakistani ports, different areas on Pak-Afghan borders and roadsides resting places along the highways in Pakistan waiting green signal from the government.

More than four thousand tankers engaged in supplies have been halted while the loading and carrying containers with food and other essentials have also been stopped, cutting off life line of the forces, at least in this harsh winter when the northern supply routes through Central Asian Republics and Russian Federation have also frozen this year.

Pakistan is holding a crucial trump card at least for three months when this inhospitable winter will keep its wings on the northern supply routes for the forces in Afghanistan. The US can manage its light supplies through northern routes by air, but its heavy supplies, possible only through sea and land routes can not be carried out in this harsh winter without route from Pakistani. Even, a long supply route through Russian Federation and central Asian Republics, after the winter is over will cost the super power 100 times more than the route through Pakistan, which is the shortest one.

The situation for the NATO forces can further worsen, if Pakistan announces to close air corridor given to the US over Pakistani territory. This situation can precipitate the miseries for the forces fighting in a barren land infested with Taliban. Pakistan Government is also contemplating to put taxes and route cess on NATO supplies, the sources in the government said.

All these steps can expedite the evacuation of US-led NATO forces from neighbouring Afghanistan, the sources told this scribe.

Army Kills 25 militants in Orakzai

Peshawar: At least 25 militants were killed and several others injured when Pakistani security forces retaliated militants attack in Goqamar area of Orakzai Agency of country’s north western tribal region.
Sources said on Wednesday, several militants attacked Pakistani check-post which led 17 security personnel wounded including a major ranked officer. They added that the forces retaliated and killed 25 militants.
Orakzai is the only tribal agency of Pakistan which does not borders Afghanistan. Militancy and sectarian violence has been in vogue for few years in the Agency while Pakistani security forces have been battling in region against the militants since 2008.

Physical Training Instructor (PTI) Male PAF Job 2012

Age: 18 to 30 Years on 30 June, 2012
Nationality: Male citizens of Pakistan
Marital Status: Married / UnMarried
Domicile:
Experience:
Educational Qualifications Intermediate with Diploma in Physical Education. NOTE: Candidates eligible for Age Relaxation as mentioned in Ad are requested to approach nearest PAF Information & Selection Centre for registration.
                                  To apply Visit www.joinpaf.gov.pk

For more jobs visit Pakistan Jobs

Join PAF as research asst job - 2011-12

Research Asst (Male)
Age: 18 to 30 Years on 30 June, 2012
Nationality: Male citizens of Pakistan
Marital Status: Married / UnMarried
Domicile:
Experience:
Educational Qualifications BSc Chemistry with experience in Textile testing laboratory of a Govt / Industrial organization is preferrable OR Three years post Matric diploma in Textile Technology from a Govt Technical Institute with one year experience in testing laboratory of a Govt / Industrial organization.
NOTE: Candidates eligible for Age Relaxation as mentioned in Ad are requested to approach nearest PAF Information & Selection Centre for registration.
For More jobs Visit Latest Jobs in Pakistan.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

We protest hack of Pakistan Defence Blog

Indian cyber army attacked Pakistan Defence Blog and hacked it successfully. They abused Pakistan Army and owner of www.pakarmydefence.blogspot.com Rana Mubashir Taqi also. I owner of www.defenceblog.org Awais Raza strongly condemn it.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Kiyani inquires about Zardari's health - ISPR

Some events of the last 72 hours are being attributed to the telephonic conversation between the President and COAS and the meeting between the Prime Minister and COAS held on 16th December 2011.
The Prime Minister has already spoken on the subject in which he stated, “during the meeting with COAS on Friday night, I received a telephonic call from the President by chance. When I informed the President that I was having a meeting with the Army Chief, the President asked me to convey his regards to General Kayani. On this, COAS showed his desire to speak to the President.”
The telephonic conversation between the President and COAS lasted approximately one minute in which he enquired about the health of the President. Hence, attributing anything more to this telephonic conversation is unfounded and unnecessary.
As regards the meeting between the COAS and Prime Minister, a comprehensive press release has already been issued by the PM House which is unambiguous.

International Conspiracies against Pakistan Army and Memo Scandal

Drone at Shamsi Air base

Before writing anything about today’s topic I would like to discuss few disclosures made by Wikileaks in the last year as these will be helpful to understand the current situation. On 8 December 2010, Wikileaks published these documents on the net and all Pakistani newspapers published them with headlines as they were linked to integrity and safety of Pakistan. The important thing in these documents was that USA (United Satanic Alliance) itself has confessed that India is involved in armed interference in Pakistan along with evidence. With reference to these Cables of American embassy that Indian army and secret agencies are interfering in Baluchistan and Waziristan. According to this disclosure US govt. has severely criticized present and previous armed and civilian leadership of India and it was verified that higher command of Indian army is busy in a dangerous game through terrorism in Pakistan. In these documents not only deep relations between Indian army and terrorist Hindu groups are discussed but they have been claimed as more dangerous than Al-Qaeda and Taliban for international peace.

                According to these Wikileaks America was of the view that the purpose of these links between Indian army and terrorist Hindu groups is to crush Indian Muslims and pressurize Pakistani ISI. These documents also include the details of a meeting between US diplomat and Hemant Karkare who arrested an on duty Indian army officer Colonel Purohit along with evidence for terrorist act of burning Samjhota Express. According to these reports, Karkare requested USA to pressurize Indian govt. for the safety of his family and himself. He made this clear to US diplomat that Indian govt. and establishment have decided to murder him for his crime of arresting and unveiling terrorists within Indian army.  In this meeting, Karkare also disclosed the names of those Indian generals who were supporting and leading terrorists within and outside Indian army.
                The most important aspect of these cables between US embassy in New Delhi and US govt. in Washington is that US has rejected any doubt about ISI’s involvement in attacks on Indian hotels on 26 November 2008 in Mumbai. Moreover, DVDs consisting of confession of Ajmal Qasab were also declared as fictional and doubtful. Indian army’s “Cold Start War Doctrine” against Pakistan and China was termed as fictional. Meanwhile US officials expressed astonishment that planning of Indian army revolves only around Pakistan and China. An earlier cable described Indian Army is involved in gross human rights violations in Indian Held part of Jammu and Kashmir while some Lt-Gen HS Panag, the then GOC-in-Chief of the Northern Command of the Indian Army was equated with General Milosevic of Bosnia with regard to butchering Muslims through war crimes. The cable urged Washington to secretly divert UN attention towards the genocide of innocent civilians in Kashmir on the hands of Indian Army and also suggested that US should avoid holding any joint drill with Indian army until it stops inhuman activities in Kashmir. In these secret documents presence of ISI is verified in India however this was told as well that ISI is not involved in any terrorist activities in India.
               
                Meanwhile in another cable the death of Karkare in the Mumbai attacks has been mentioned as a staged drama and concerns were expressed over the loss of an important link and evidence. US govt. was also advised to ban all Indian organizations including Hindu Council of America who were providing financial support to Shiv Sena and other Hindu terrorist organizations. US was also warned that if these Hindu terrorist groups are not brought to an end in the coming years they will prove a time bomb for the peace of the area. Indian government's capability to handle Naxals has been also doubted as there is hardly any writ of Indian govt. and the presence of more than 80% nuclear installments of India makes the situation graver. This area is known as Red Corridor among Indian intellectuals.

This was a brief discussion of American cables about our region which were termed as fake by US govt. on protest of India in order to protect US interests. However, has anyone any doubt about the genocide of Kashmiri Muslims by Indian army? Is not his truth that on duty officers of Indian army and Hindu terrorists were involved in terrorist burning of Samjhota Express? Is this a lie that the South and North-western Indian states are practically in the control of Naxals and Maoists? Where Indian army cannot imagine to move freely, where hundreds of Indian army personnel are not only killed in a single attack but their under garments are torn away as well? India could not dare to face them so blames ISI and Pakistan in its propaganda war. The term Islamic extremism was invented by India which has been successfully used Israel to cover its genocide of Muslims. But the more serious problem is that the international media is also blaming Pakistan, at least why? This is a such question for which Pakistani people have no answer, they are just witnessing that since 1947 India has not spared a single to chance to harm Pakistan. India played an important role in the division of Pakistan in 1971 utilizing its resources, huge army, and international Jewish companies. Later on in order to hide its terrorist organizations and conspiracies on international level Pakistan army was posed as Punjabi army. The more painful aspect is that following the Indian conspiracies our traitors have succeeded in convincing the public that fall of Dhaka was a defeat of Pakistani army and all political parties used this as a propaganda weapon against Pakistan army. While on 15 April 2007, in Bareli of UP province of India, during an election campaign Rahul Gandhi claimed fall of Dhaka as great achievement of his family, he disclosed that how more than 1 billion Hindus in Bengal played their role in this conspiracy fulfilling their religious duty. Not only this, he addressed Pakistan in the west that do not worry we (Congress party) will get freedom for you as well. He was obviously talking to his friends in Pakistan who sometimes dream separation of Baluchistan and sometimes they threaten to change the geography of Pakistan. They claim Kala Bagh Dam as poison for Pakistan and water terrorism of India as its basic right, they blame Pakistan army for all the problems of Pakistan (i.e. existence of Pakistan until now is due to its army).
Dual Standards: On the right hand US soldier crying after hugging his baby while on the left same aged baby is being body searched
                Pakistani people are just witnessing powerlessly the massacre of innocents for last 33 years. On the other hand, in the markets, on the roads, offices, trains, buses everywhere innocent Pakistanis were targeted with bomb blasts and terrorism. When Soviet Union attacked Afghanistan at that time Moscow’s need was to access sea via Pakistani sea-shores for exploitation of resources of middle eastern states. All this was done in the name of peace in Afghanistan. When Afghans started resistance against Soviet invaders, this became necessary for Pakistan to support them as the seashore strip is important for Pakistani economy. During this period from Karachi to Peshawar all cities were filled with blood of innocents. There was not a single city of Pakistan that was saved from terrorist attacks and suicide bombs. Thousands of innocent Pakistanis were murdered in remote control bomb blasts. Several terrorists were arrested and astonishingly all belonged to Afghanistan. We kept silent on these terrorist activities (of world powers) and world did not give any importance to it. Just few reports were published that KGB, Afghan KHAR, and Indian RAW are punishing Pakistanis for war in Afghanistan. More astonishing fact is that few of these terrorists who confessed their crimes in open trials, their links with their agencies has been also proved with evidence, they are waiting for hanging in Pakistani prisoners, and now our rulers are finding excuses for sending them back to India because they are Indians and India is our rulers’ most favorite nation. (This is the same terrorist state India which staged drama of Mumbai attacks just to remove few of its honest police and intelligence officers and blamed Pakistan for its own terrorist acts because an important personality of Pakistan said that few non state actors of Pakistan might be involved in these attacks).
                At that time US also participated in Afghan war foreseeing the defeat of Red army and Soviet army left Afghanistan with the gold medal of defeat in Afghanistan. However, Pakistan kept hosting 7 million Afghan migrants who became target of civil war as a result of inhuman policies of American and western forces for their damn interests. Half of these migrants are still living in Pakistan and Afghan President says that Pakistan will have to continue supporting them. On one side we had to bear this extra pressure on our already poor economy while on the other hand a group of our intellectuals, and journalists were criticizing role of Pakistani army in afghan war as army’s policy to safeguard American interests. They were repeating the propaganda of India on international level. These (sold) minds that were against USA at that time, now they are supporting US policies against Pakistani army and earning dollars for participating in propaganda war of enemies of Pakistan.
US forces in a mosque in Iraq!
                Hard time for Pakistani and Afghan people started afresh when USA as a reaction to its own terrorist act of 9/11 attacked Afghanistan to test its latest weapons on living human beings. In fact neither of the pilots who crashed aeroplanes with WTC were Pakhtoon nor they had any link with Afghanistan. Attackers as claimed by USA belonged to Arabs, who had tired protesting against State terrorism of Israel in Palestine and their protest had converted into hatred against USA. But USA in the name of presence of Osama in Afghanistan invaded a sovereign state with rain of Daisy-Cutter and other lethal bombs from its B-52 bombers. They did this as they were taking revenge from the Afghan public. At that time western world had no time to think that how Osama, equipped with light weapons, wandering in the mountains of Afghanistan had got such a lamp of Aladdin that he had got such latest and scientific techniques to control these pilots? Moreover how he forced these pilots who had been trained in USA to go on the journey of death, and also guided them to leave documents containing their identity in their cars outside the airports so that later on Americans can arrest and torture their families?
                However in the last ten years team of engineers and scientists in Europe has proved that in the light of experiments, 9/11 tragedy was a strange example of American state terrorism in which in order to achieve higher interests of US establishment, such a terrorist drama was planned under the cover of which US govt. succeeded in getting free hand for massacre of humanity in two sovereign states. In the videos of these experiments, these scientists have proved that these buildings did not fell due to the crash of plans and fire due to plane fuel, but due to the modern bombs that were planted in the parallel steel pillars from bottom to top storey. Now western analysts have also accepted that Bush and Dick Cheney related to oil business had planned to capture Iraq. In spite of directly hitting Iraq they thought it necessary to attack Afghanistan first. Some groups are of the view that few American elements (CIA) linked with smuggling of drugs forced US to attack Afghanistan first. Through this, international Zionists have captured resources for their multinational companies for future, American weapon industry being on top of them. Moreover world has ignored Israeli state terrorism in Palestine under the fear of AL-Qaeda which was later on changed as Taliban by these western propagandists. Because now these multinational companies and their Jewish owners do not want to leave resources of Afghanistan.
After murdering their parents US soldiers giving flowers to Afghan Children
                But the problem is that in spite of murder of more than 1 million innocents in last ten years USA had not been able to properly capture Afghanistan and defeat Afghans. Now it seems that UNO has given mandate to USA for genocide of Muslims. The videos of American  invasion can still be viewed on the internet. On the one hand these videos show the mountains of Tora Bora changing into dust after due to US bombs after watching which many countries have got afraid that if they dared to stand in front of US terrorism they will be punished like Afghans hiding in Tora Bora. On the other hand these videos show American soldiers entering into Afghanistan with flowers, while few afghan children in dirty clothes are along with them. The purpose behind this propaganda was that they have not invaded Afghanistan but they had come to free these people (from life). UNO had given them mandate to free Muslim public and made Americans saviors.  After Afghanistan, Iraq, then Libya and now Syria, God knows which Muslim country will be chosen next to quench the thirst of UNO for Muslim blood.
                If we look at poor US public, the situation is that due to shortage of space for burial of US soldiers killed in Afghanistan, more than 250 corpses of US soldiers were dumped into waste after burning them. Because the sports grounds and public parks in US cantonments have been filled with corpses of US soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now this process of burning and dumping of dead bodies of soldiers has become a conflict. Widow of one such soldier has decided to go to US judiciary, she is of the view that these soldiers have given up their lives for Americans not that their corpses should be burnt and dumped into waste.
               
                USA considers Pakistan army responsible for defeat of US forces in Afghanistan, because Pakistani army had not played any role in genocide of Afghans. USA is not ready to accept that Pakistan has given sacrifice of more than 5000 security personnel (mostly in attacks planned in Afghanistan) and more than 35,000 innocent Pakistani people. Now USA wants to blame Pakistan for her defeat so that she may run away from here, take some rest and attack some other Muslim country to drink the blood of Muslims. But Pakistan is not ready to sacrifice anymore for USA (United Satanic Alliance). The reward of sacrifices of Pakistani nation has been given by USA in the attack on Pakistani posts on 26 November. Whole nation is protesting against it and ISAF commander general Allen says that such attacks may occur in future as well. This is an attempt to further agitate Pakistani nation. Not only this the propaganda against Pakistan army is also going on to create conflict between Pakistani public and army. This has now recently adopted the form of “Memo Gate Scandal”. After this, few of our anchorpersons and analysts are busy in creating hatred in the minds of public against Pakistan army. A long time has passed, army has got aside from politics but these paid analysts are still discussing possibilities of Martial Law. Who is behind this propaganda campaign? Has USA also started thinking like India that Pakistan army is the greatest hurdle in their damn imperialist plans? These questions and reasons behind Memo Gate will be discussed next week…
Written By Khalid Baig,
Published in Daily Nawa-i-Waqt,
Date: 17 December, 2011.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Soldier died in clash against militants, 20 militants killed


PARACHINAR, Pakistan — A local government official says militants set off a roadside bomb near a Pakistani army convoy in a tribal region close to the Afghan border, sparking clashes that killed one soldier and 20 militants.
Wajid Khan says the incident took place in Khanki village in the Upper Orakzai region on Friday.

He says 25 soldiers were wounded in the militants’ attack. He says the troops repelled the attack, surrounded and killed 20 militants.
The region is home to insurgents loyal to Pakistani Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud.
Some insurgent commanders in Pakistan have claimed to be in peace talks with the government recently. Others have denied any negotiations, as has the government.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

America to attack on Pakistan in March, secret report


According to reports NATO attack on Pakistan was planned. Most of Pakistan Army official already stated that.

But what about the latest report? According to a report published by local newspaper NATO is soon going to strike Pakistan and previous attack was a part of this plan. First of all they will land their forces in north Waziristan  blaming to attack on terrorists. Pakistan will hit them back and it will cause declaration of war from both sides.

America is already prepared for such an attack. They are preparing for this attack since 2 years. America will never apologize to Pakistan because performing such act will cause America to stop such attacks further. Such attack is expected in March or April next year.

America will attack after winter for faster movement of army. Until that times they will keep dialogues with Pakistan but will never apologize.

For two years American planes passed through Pakistan border. These planes were carrying warfare equipment to be used against Pakistan. 

It is not a threat for Pakistan but more challenge for America because they are currently facing economic problems. An article about Pak US war and economic issues for both countries will be discussed later.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Contact Defence Blog




Hello Guys, I am Awais Raza Admin of this blog. You can contact me for various purposes. You can share your opinion at my blog or write an article. You can also become author of Defence Blog. Feedback and suggestions will also be appreciated. You can ask anything about Pakistan Armed Forces and even can request me a research article. You can even contact me just personally. For all this contact me using the form below.
You can also add me at FaceBook . Click Here to see me on FaceBook


US vacates Pakistan airbase

The United States has vacated a Pakistani airbase following a deadline given by Islamabad in the wake of anger over NATO air strikes last month that killed 24 soldiers, officials said.
Pakistan's military said in a statement that the last flight carrying US personnel and equipment had left Shamsi airbase, in the south-western province of Baluchistan, completing a process that began last week.
Islamabad's fragile alliance with the United States crashed to new lows in the wake of the November 26 NATO air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and which the Pakistan military called a deliberate attack.
The base was widely believed to have been used in covert CIA drone attacks against the Taliban and Al Qaeda commanders in north-west Pakistan's tribal areas, which border Afghanistan.
"The control of the base has been taken over by the Army," the statement from Pakistan said.
A senior security official requesting anonymity earlier told AFP: "The Americans have vacated the Shamsi air base and it has been handed over to the Pakistani security forces."
Another official in Baluchistan confirmed that the last batch of US officials left in two flights on Sunday.
Following the November air strikes, Pakistan closed two border crossings to Afghanistan to US and NATO supplies and gave American personnel until Sunday to leave Shamsi airbase.
US ambassador to Islamabad, Cameron Munter, told a Pakistan television channel last week: "We are complying with the request."
A security official said the US aircraft left the Pakistani airfield on Sunday afternoon with the remaining group of 32 US officials and material.
US president Barack Obama last Sunday expressed condolences to Pakistan's president Asif Ali Zardari for the soldier deaths and said the NATO air strikes that killed them were not a "deliberate attack."
But the incident has rocked Washington's alliance with its counter-terrorism ally Islamabad, though officials say neither country can afford a complete break in relations.
US officials and intelligence analysts have said the covert drone war would not be affected by the closure of the base as Washington could fly Predator and Reaper drones out of air fields in neighbouring Afghanistan.
But the Shamsi air base was supposed to be particularly useful for flights hampered by poor weather conditions.
Islamabad has tacitly consented to the covert US drone campaign, which many Pakistanis see as a violation of their country's sovereignty.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-12-12/us-vacates-pakistan-airbase/3724976

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Why did NATO select night of 26 November for attack over Pakistani Posts?

Salala Check Post!

If we look into the near past, not more time has passed, just few weeks ago, Hilary was laughing on being termed as mother-in-law on her visit to Islamabad in order to decrease the tension between the both countries. Her previous behavior devoid of emotions was not visible anywhere. Because on 13 of September, 2011, Taliban entered into the stronghold of Americans in the Kabul i.e. American embassy (still this has not been disclosed that Taliban went their just to fire bullets in the air or they were busy in fighting with walls for nineteen hours, how many Americans were killed by them this is still a secret), this act of Taliban was not only shameful for Obama govt. but Pentagon as well. Under the pressure of this act retiring General of American Army blamed Pakistan for this act in front of defense committee of Congress, and had tried to prove that Pakistan is harboring terrorists and conducting attacks on allied forces in Afghanistan via Haqqani Network.

Funeral Prayers of Martyrs of Salala Check Post...
                This is another fact that White house did not support Mullen’s statement and US Foreign Ministry was forced to issue the statement that US govt. rejects accuses of Mullen over ISI and Pakistan army. However in order to pressurize Pakistan statements blaming Pakistan were issued more rigorously. The main focus was that Pak-Army should start operation against Saraaj-u-Din  Haqqani and his network hiding in North Waziristan. The main purpose of this propaganda was to befool US public that the reason behind US failure and deaths in Afghanistan is neither their ineligible Generals and commanders (who are sucking the blood out of US public in the form of taxes) nor their illegal and immoral hold of Afghanistan resulting in resistance from Afghans but Pakistan and terrorists from Pakistan.
                Pakistan was also forced to use media in spite of diplomatic channels to tackle this situation. When the world was told that Uncle Sam itself is in contact with Haqqani network and holding talks with them. Moreover there is not network of Haqqani in North Waziristan but in Afghanistan controlling more than seven provinces, while in four of these provinces Americans and allies have to take permission from Haqqani before moving in their vehicles for safe return. After such disclosures by Pakistan, Americans were forced to confess in front of journalists that they have contacts with Haqqani because further denial might have resulted in worst situation. Moreover Pakistan has also created tension for USA by saying NO MORE as a reaction to Mullen’s statement.
Capt. Usman (on the left) martyred in the NATO terrorist attack over Salala Check Post
                Hilary visited Islamabad to decrease this tension but Deputy Commander of NATO General Krits started blaming Pakistan and issued statement, “terrorists attack American and allied forces with the support of Pakistan army and when terrorists are attacking allied forces Pakistani soldiers on the border stay silent this shows they are supporting terrorists attacks”. Here this should be kept in mind that General Krits also belongs to US army, than is there any lack of communication between US govt. and its Generals deployed in Afghanistan or all this is being done just to befool the international community? Because on the midnight of Friday-Saturday the posts of Pakistan army named as Salala, Waali Chalo and Boulder attacked by NATO like thieves, are those check posts which were mentioned in General Krits statement. Than is this not surprising that just five hours before the attack ISAF Commander John Allen met General Kiyani?
                Now lets come towards NATO attack, whole world is surprised because no apparent reason is visible behind this terrorist attack. But the harsh reaction of Pakistan and cutting NATO supply via Pakistan has made White House restless, while on the other hand a new misleading statement has been issued that allied forces were busy in operation against terrorists in front of these post, the soldiers on these posts fired rounds over allied forces and as a reaction the commander of allied forces requested for air support and thus NATO air force targeted Pakistani posts. In this way state terrorists of more than two dozen countries, enemies of Pakistan in the form of Northern Alliance and master minds of this terrorist act has tried to give a new color to this attack, but unbiased defense analysts of the whole world are not ready to accept this crafted version of state terrorism as true. Because on the other hand Afghan President or Afghan Foreign Ministry has not issued any statement in support of NATO allegations and second UNO has not allowed NATO to conduct any operations or attacks outside Afghanistan.
Protest against Afghan war in USA!
                Pakistan has already clarified that this areas is clear of all terrorists and secondly these posts were built to stop terrorists entering into Pakistan in the form of hundreds from Afghanistan to attack Pakistani forces. So has NATO attacked these posts to clear the hurdles in the way of these terrorists attacking Pakistan? What is the link between NATO and terrorism in Pakistan? Moreover the peace talks with Taliban and decrease in suicide bomb attacks in Pakistan may be also a reason if NATO attacks. However here we will have to look that who was benefiting from poor situation of peace in Pakistan and what were the hidden purposes behind these attacks? If we look at NATO we cannot find a single country member of NATO who may benefit for this. The NATO officials should have also known that if their supply via Pakistan is halted than their stability in Afghanistan will be difficult. Because on the night of 30 September when NATO helicopters had attacked Pakistani check post and martyred 3 Pakistani soldiers and after one day later when tribal elders who were gathered for peace talks were martyred in the bombardment, so as a reaction NATO supply was temporarily halted, so this brought minds of NATO on ground and ISAF and NATO both requested forgiveness in written form. But the continuous of these terrorist acts by NATO and attack on 26 November is very heinous. Some defense analysts are of the view that this is a message from US forces, other claim it as American response to forced resignation of Hussein Haqqani, Pakistani ambassador to USA. In the same way the reaction of UAE on the order of closure of Shamsi airbase is also very strange, because govt. has been telling the nation that this airbase is in use of brother Islamic country UAE, but seems the reality was different than this. Because how is this possible that NATO attacks Pakistan and as a reaction UAE is ordered to close airbase? Not only this UAE has requested Pakistan to be patient and wait till results of NATO investigations are available. This request was rejected by Pakistan.
Shamsi Air base; USA has been ordered to evacuate it within 15 days.
                Moreover there is another aspect which needs attention, after alleged attack of NATO people are raising questions about the capability of Pakistan army, that why did not the soldiers on watch at the time of attack retaliate? If like this enemy airforce can enter any part of country through any part of border and targets any important installations than will the soldiers be killed like unarmed men? In the present situation when Pakistani nation is much angry and pessimist, the army is also enraged. As a result Pakistani nation has started demanding that the relations with the USA should be amended and moreover Pakistan should get out of so-called war on terror and the war should be limited to militants who are attacking Pakistan, who are supported by USA, Israel and India covertly. Otherwise no matter how much well organized a militant group it is impossible for them to stand in front of Pakistan security forces without financial and military aid. Pakistan should not be sacrificed for interests of USA any more.
                However whatever has happened we may take it as a chance provided by nature to get rid of America, who has enslaved Pakistan in the name of aid. The most painful aspect of friendship with USA is that after Pakistan joined so-called American war on terror Pakistan is the only country which has to bear the most of the loss. More than 30000 innocent citizens became target of suicide and terrorist attacks. Their only was that their rulers have decided to join USA in its so-called war on terror or state terrorism. In this way including General to soldier Pakistani nation has sacrificed more than 6000 personnel of security forces. After such great sacrifices Pakistan army did not lose courage, after complete movement of citizens to safe places, clearing Swar and Malakand and than rehabilitation of locals is such a great achievement of Pak-Army that one can hardly find and example.
                The war capabilities of Pak-army and their sacrifices are also acknowledged by defense analysts. But the criticism of US critics, Congress members, candidate for Presidentship are not only painful but disgusting, they are always blaming Pakistan that it has done nothing against terrorism in spite of US aid which we never received. Here is an example of such criticism or propagandas:
The Pakistani state (Punjabi Army/ISI) has a tenuous control over the FATA/KP region beyond 50-60 miles west of the Indus. Their writ does not run there.
 Baluchistan is truly the wild West. Sparsely populated desert with little in terms of infrastructure.



There is absolutely no reason for the US to invade Pakistan proper (i.e. Punjab and Sindh).
What we need to do is to:

Take the battle across the Durand Line. Read them the riot act and ask them to either withdraw their forces. After all the writ of the Pakistani state hardly runs there, so you are not going to be changing anything dramatically except for sending the Punjabis back home. (US conspiracy; what they did in Iraq, and Libya where they could not dare to attack properly before their terrorists had done the job).

NATO supply containers over the border after supply to NATO has been halted

The above quoted criticism is based upon the same rhetoric of Akhand Bharat which was propagated with the independence of Pakistan in 1947. On the basis of this theory India with the support of West is busy in conspiracies and terrorism in Baluchistan. However this also shows that American govt. is thinking of attacking Pakistan. The proof is the edition of Asia Times, published on 1 October in Hong Kong, it reports that Pakistan may be the next target of the USA. Because has now nothing left to spend against terrorists. Al-Qaeda is a part of past, now Americans has created a new Ghost, i.e. Haqqani network. ISI is being blamed for support of them. So in this situation what should Pakistan do? We divide this in three parts:
  1. After aggressive attacks of NATO all the relations with USA should be reconsidered and a clear policy should be established. In the beginning the court martial of NATO pilots should be demanded who attacked Pakistani posts. Moreover the commander of ISAF who requested the air support, the commander of ISAF air base who provided these pilots with location and maps of Pakistani post and gave them clearance for flight should be also court martial. This demand should be forwarded from Pakistan Parliament and USA should be made clear that Pakistani nation is not ready to accept anything less than that. As the result of court martial this will be also cleared that whether this attack was a conspiracy at local level or the higher officials of ISAF also part of this. This will be cleared that whether any role of India or Northern alliance was involved in this aggression or not?
  2. In spite of accepting superiority of India just for US interests and creating troubles for other small countries of the country, the talks should be initiated with India to resolve disputes. After all disputes with India are resolved than India should be given access to Middle East. Because this is no more a secret that USA wants to transfer its corporate sector in India where there is abundance of cheap labor  and also in order to control energy crises and destroying US economy.
  3. 26 November has passed and that with silence? Is not this strange that after 2008 first time India has remained silent on 26 November, no statement has been issued about Mumbai attacks, even Indian media did not publish any memorial news report. This is against the habit of India, than was the attack of NATO on the night of 26 November a mere coincidence or something else? This should be also investigated. Maybe RAW is behind this attack.
Moreover the elements who are trying to make nation afraid of American weaponry thy should look towards Iran. Looking at the Israeli propaganda it seemed as Israeli air force will target Irani nuclear installments any time, but strong reaction of Irani leadership has forced many American think tanks to reconsider their aggressive plans and advise US govt. that it should control its illegitimate child Israel. Because if Israel did so , Iran has also warned that any aggressive act from Israel will be retaliated by launch of more than 150,000 missiles at the same time from different parts of Iran vanishing Israel from the map and targeting American installations in the area. The first rule of victory is too stand in front of enemy…
Written By Khalid Baig,
Published in Daily Nawa-i-Waqt,
Date: 3 December, 2011.